4.8 Article

Multicomponent reaction-derived covalent inhibitor space

期刊

SCIENCE ADVANCES
卷 7, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abd9307

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [2R01GM097082-05]
  2. European Lead Factory (IMI) [115489]
  3. Qatar National Research Foundation [NPRP6-065-3-012]
  4. ITN AcceleratedEarly stage drug dIScovery (AEGIS) [675555]
  5. COFUND ALERT [665250]
  6. Hartstichting (eSCAPE-HF) [2018B012]
  7. KWF Kankerbestrijding grant [10504]
  8. LPDP (Indonesian Endowment Fund for Education)
  9. KWF [10504]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrates that multicomponent reactions are highly suitable for generating libraries of electrophiles based on different scaffolds and three-dimensional shapes, and are highly compatible with multiple functional groups. The operational procedure is simple, mild, and cost-effective, facilitating future covalent library synthesis.
The area of covalent inhibitors is gaining momentum due to recently introduced clinical drugs, but libraries of these compounds are scarce. Multicomponent reaction (MCR) chemistry is well known for its easy access to a very large and diverse chemical space. Here, we show that MCRs are highly suitable to generate libraries of electrophiles based on different scaffolds and three-dimensional shapes and highly compatible with multiple functional groups. According to the building block principle of MCR, acrylamide, acrylic acid ester, sulfurylfluoride, chloroacetic acid amide, nitrile, and alpha,beta-unsaturated sulfonamide warheads can be easily incorporated into many different scaffolds. We show examples of each electrophile on 10 different scaffolds on a preparative scale as well as in a high-throughput synthesis mode on a nanoscale to produce libraries of potential covalent binders in a resource-and time-saving manner. Our operational procedure is simple, mild, and step economical to facilitate future covalent library synthesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据