4.8 Article

Fast, reversible mechanochromism of regioisomeric oxazine mechanophores: Developing in situ responsive force probes for polymeric materials

期刊

CHEM
卷 7, 期 4, 页码 1080-1091

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.chempr.2021.02.014

关键词

-

资金

  1. AFOSR Center of Excellence [FA9550-20-1-0194]
  2. Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new family of mechanophores based on the oxazine (OX) structural motif was developed to address issues of hysteretic or irreversible mechanochromism found in most bond-scission-based mechanophores. The OX mechanophores exhibit faster and reversible mechanochromism without any sign of fatigue when compared with other mechanophores. Constrained DFT simulations correlated the experimental findings to molecular scale events, providing deeper understanding to a broad range of soft materials by in situ monitoring the local mechanics.
To address hysteretic or irreversible mechanochromism found in most bond-scission-based mechanophores, we developed a new family of mechanophores based on the oxazine (OX) structural motif. Three OX regioisomers differing in their point of attachment to the indole ring show variable mechanochromic mechanoresponsiveness in a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) matrix. Constrained DFT simulations correlate the experimental findings to molecular scale events; two of the three regioisomers exhibit a force-activated rearrangement, while the third one is mechanochemically inactive. Most significantly, when compared with the spiropyran (SP) and the naphthopyran (NP), the OX mechanophores exhibit faster and reversible mechanochromism without any sign of fatigue. Such a rapid response to mechanical loads is rationalized by the difference between SP and OX scaffolds, given that the SP ring opening is accompanied by a trans-cis isomerization step. These fast-responsive mechanophores are anticipated to bring deeper understanding to a broad range of soft materials by in situ monitoring the local mechanics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据