4.6 Article

Application of Polyvinyl Acetate/Lignin Copolymer as Bio-Based Coating Material and Its Effects on Paper Properties

期刊

COATINGS
卷 11, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/coatings11020192

关键词

lignin-vinyl acetate copolymer; coating paper; physicochemical and mechanical properties

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFB0308000]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31971605, 31570566, 31600472]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrates the successful synthesis of lignin-vinyl acetate copolymers for coating paper, leading to enhancements in physical and chemical properties, air permeability, and mechanical strength. Increasing lignin content in the copolymer results in further improvements in coated paper properties, showing potential applications in packaging.
In this work, lignin-vinyl acetate copolymers containing different fractions of lignin were synthesized by the copolymerization technique. The synthesized copolymer was successfully applied to coat the paper for enhancing its properties and performance. The effects of the lignin-vinyl acetate copolymer on the physicochemical, air permeability and mechanical properties of paper were investigated. The mechanical strength, hydrophilic, and air permeability properties of coated paper were improved with the increasing content of the lignin. Lignin-vinyl acetate copolymer containing 15% lignin coated paper exhibited a 1.86 times increase in the tensile index, 45 times increase in the water contact angle, and a 41.1% reduction in the air permeability compared with uncoated paper. Scanning electron microscopy was applied to study the morphology of the coated and uncoated paper. The results showed that paper surface porosity structure was decreased, while the surface smoothness was enhanced considerably with increasing lignin fraction in the copolymer. Therefore, the successful fabrication of such an enchanting coated paper may afford new potential and great applications in the packaging paper.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据