4.6 Article

Effects of social experience, aggressiveness and comb size on contest success in male domestic fowl

期刊

ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE
卷 8, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.201213

关键词

aggression; intra-sexual selection; ontogeny; social dominance; social rank; social status

资金

  1. Alice och Lars Silens fond
  2. LiU programme 'Future research leaders' - Swedish Research Council [2018-03772]
  3. Swedish Research Council [2018-03772] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that social experience positively influences contest success in male domestic fowl, but aggression and morphological traits also play an important role.
The ability to dominate conspecifics and thereby gain access to resources depends on a number of traits and skills. Experience of dominance relationships during development is a potential source of learning such skills. We here study the importance of social experience, aggressiveness and morphological traits for competitiveness in social interactions (contest success) in male domestic fowl (Gallus gallus domesticus). We let males grow up either as a single (dominant) male or as an intermediately ranked male in a group of males, and measured their success in duels against different opponents. We found that single-raised males had lower contest success than group-raised males, and that aggression and comb size correlated positively with contest success. This indicates that experience of dominance interactions with other males increases future success in duels. We similarly studied the consequences of growing up as a dominant or subordinate in a pair of males, finding no statistically significant effect of the dominance position on contest success. Finally, we found that males were consistent over time in contest success. We conclude that social experience increases contest success in male domestic fowl, but that certain behavioural and morphological characteristics have an equal or even stronger covariation with contest success.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据