4.7 Article

Optimized epoxy foam interface of CFRP/Epoxy Foam/CFRP sandwich composites for improving compressive and impact properties

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.01.015

关键词

Fabrication process; Epoxy foam (EF); Sandwich composite; Micro-mechanics

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [2020R1A6A1A 03038697]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the optimal manufacturing conditions of epoxy foam to enhance the mechanical performance of carbon fiber reinforced plastic sandwich composites for vehicle parts. The study found that the foam cured at 60 degrees Celsius exhibited the most stable properties after thermal aging at 180 degrees Celsius. The performance of the sandwich composites was improved by optimizing the cell condition of the foam.
Composite materials for vehicle parts require lightweight, high strength and good impact properties. In this study, the optimized manufacturing conditions of epoxy foam (EF) were investigated to improving mechanical performance of carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP)/EF/CFRP sandwich composites for vehicle parts such as impact, flexural property. The optimal curing temperature was found to be 60 degrees C, by measuring the reaction rate, volume increase rate, density, cell size, glass transition temperature, and specific compressive strength of the EF. In addition, foams after 180 degrees C thermal aging were observed, and the properties of the EF cured at 60 degrees C were the most stable under the thermal aging. The performance of the sandwich EF composites was investigated using compressive, flexural strength, lap shear strength, and impact tests. The optimized cell condition of the EF was correlated to improving interfacial adhesion of sandwich composite. (C) (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据