4.7 Article

Physical Layer Security of Large Reflecting Surface Aided Communications With Phase Errors

期刊

IEEE WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS LETTERS
卷 10, 期 2, 页码 325-329

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LWC.2020.3029816

关键词

Signal to noise ratio; Fading channels; Wireless communication; Receivers; Measurement; Physical layer security; Wireless sensor networks; Fading channels; large reflecting surfaces; phase errors; physical layer security; wireless communications

资金

  1. Escuela Politecnica Nacional [PIGR-19-06]
  2. Spanish Government
  3. European Fund for Regional Development FEDER [TEC2017-87913-R]
  4. Junta de Andalucia [P18-RT-3175]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The analysis of physical layer security (PLS) performance in wireless communication links with a large reflecting surface (LRS) and phase errors shows that LRS-aided communications have great potential to enhance PLS in practical wireless set-ups. The eavesdropper's link is Rayleigh distributed and independent of the legitimate link, demonstrating different scaling laws for legitimate and eavesdroppers signal-to-noise ratios with the number of reflecting elements. Additionally, even with coarse phase quantization, the performance is reasonably good, indicating promising results for PLS enhancements.
The physical layer security (PLS) performance of a wireless communication link through a large reflecting surface (LRS) with phase errors is analyzed. Leveraging recent results that express the LRS-based composite channel as an equivalent scalar fading channel, we show that the eavesdropper's link is Rayleigh distributed and independent of the legitimate link. The different scaling laws of the legitimate and eavesdroppers signal-to-noise ratios with the number of reflecting elements, and the reasonably good performance even in the case of coarse phase quantization, show the great potential of LRS-aided communications to enhance PLS in practical wireless set-ups.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据