4.5 Review

Vacancy Engineering of Ultrathin 2D Materials for Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction

期刊

CHEMNANOMAT
卷 7, 期 4, 页码 368-379

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cnma.202100051

关键词

ultrathin 2D materials; vacancy engineering; CO2 reduction; photocatalysis

资金

  1. State Key Research Development Program of China [2016YFA0204200]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21822603, 21773062, 21577036]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review focuses on vacancy-engineered ultrathin materials for CO2 photoreduction, discussing different types of vacancies and their roles in the catalytic process, and presenting various vacancy engineering strategies. Future developments and associated challenges concerning defective ultrathin 2D materials are also discussed.
Photocatalytic carbon dioxide (CO2) reduction is a sustainable and green strategy for the conversion of CO2 into hydrocarbon solar fuels, whereas its large-scale application is severely restricted by lack of highly effective photocatalysts. Ultrathin 2D materials with tunable electronic structure display great potential towards photocatalytic CO2 reduction. However, the photocatalytic performance still remains unsatisfied due to high activation energy of CO2 molecules on catalytic sites. To this end, surface vacancy engineering can endow coordinately unsaturated sites as actively catalytic sites for CO2 molecules chemisorption and activation. In this review, we focus on vacancy-engineered ultrathin materials for CO2 photoreduction. Different vacancies with classified anion vacancies, cation vacancies, vacancy pairs, voids, and their corresponding role in CO2 photoreduction are proposed. The different strategies based on vacancy engineering, including direct modulation of vacancy concentrations, refining vacancy states by heteroatom, and vacancy-engineered heterostructure, are presented. Finally, the future developments and their associated challenges concerning defective ultrathin 2D materials are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据