4.8 Article

Atmospheric Fossil Fuel CO2 Traced by Δ14C in Beijing and Xiamen, China: Temporal Variations, Inland/Coastal Differences and Influencing Factors

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 50, 期 11, 页码 5474-5480

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b02591

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41573136, 41303072]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China
  3. MOST special fund for State Key Laboratory of Loess and Quaternary Geology [LQ1301]
  4. CAS
  5. Young scholar project of the Institute of Earth Environment [Y354011480]
  6. CAS Light of West China Program [XAB2015A02]
  7. Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS [2016360]
  8. Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province, China [2014JQ2-4018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

One year of atmospheric Delta(CO2)-C-14 were observed in 2014 in the inland city of Beijing and coastal city of Xiamen, China, to trace temporal CO2ff variations and to determine the factors influencing them. The average CO2ff concentrations at the sampling sites in Beijing and Xiamen were 39.7 +/- 36.1 ppm and 13.6 +/- 12.3 ppm, respectively. These contributed 75.2 +/- 14.6% and 59.1 +/- 26.8% to their respective annual Delta CO2 offsets over background CO2 concentrations. Significantly (p < 0.05) high CO2ff values were observed in winter in Beijing. We did not find any significant differences in CO2ff values between weekdays and weekends. Diurnal CO2ff variations were plainly evident, with high values between midnight and 4:00, and during morning and afternoon rush hours. The sampling site in the inland city of Beijing displayed much higher CO2ff inputs and overall temporal variations than the site in the coastal city of Xiamen. The variations of CO2ff at both sites were controlled by a combination of emission sources, topography, and atmospheric dispersion. In particular, diurnal observations at the urban site in Beijing showed that CO2ff was easily accumulated under the southeast wind conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据