4.6 Article

Regional Climate Model Biases, Their Dependence on Synoptic Circulation Biases and the Potential for Bias Adjustment: A Process-Oriented Evaluation of the Austrian Regional Climate Projections

期刊

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2020JD032824

关键词

Austria; bias adjustment; climate model evaluation; large‐ scale circulation errors; regional climate projections

资金

  1. Austrian Climate Research Programme [KR15AC8K12604, KR18AC0K14748]
  2. Austrian Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management
  3. governments of the federal states of Austria
  4. Julich Supercomputing Centre (JSC) [JJSC39]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study evaluates the impact of large-scale circulation errors on climate models and the effectiveness of bias adjustment in reducing biases. While bias adjustment can greatly reduce biases in most cases, it may amplify conditional biases in certain situations.
The Austrian regional climate projections are based on an ensemble of bias adjusted regional climate model simulations. Bias adjustment (BA) improves the usability of climate projections for impact studies, but cannot mitigate fundamental model errors. This argument holds in particular for biases in the temporal dependence, which is strongly influenced by the large-scale circulation. Global climate models (GCMs), underlying regional climate projections, suffer from substantial circulation errors. We therefore, conduct a process-based evaluation of the Austrian climate projections focusing on large-scale circulation errors, their regional imprints and the potential for BA. First, we define nine synoptic weather types and assess how well the considered climate models represent their occurrence and persistence. Second, we assess biases in the overall dry and hot day probabilities, as well as conditional on synoptic weather type occurrence; and biases in the duration of dry and hot spells. Third, we investigate how these biases depend on biases in the occurrence and persistence of relevant synoptic weather types. And fourth, we study how much an overall BA improves these biases. Many GCMs misrepresent the occurrence and persistence of relevant synoptic weather types. These biases have a clear imprint on biases in dry and hot day occurrence and spell durations. BA in many cases helps to greatly reduce biases even in the presence of circulation biases, but may in some cases amplify conditional biases. Persistence biases are especially relevant for the representation of meteorological drought. Biases in the duration of dry spells cannot fully be mitigated by BA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据