4.8 Article

Structure, Variation, and Co-occurrence of Soil Microbial Communities in Abandoned Sites of a Rare Earth Elements Mine

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 50, 期 21, 页码 11481-11490

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b02284

关键词

-

资金

  1. Special Fund of Environmental Protection Research for Public Welfare of China [201509037]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41225004, 41403060]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [15lgpy02, 15lgjc36]
  4. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control and Remediation Technology [2016K0005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mining activity for rare earth elements (REEs) has caused serious environmental pollution, particularly for soil ecosystems. However, the effects of REEs on soil microbiota are still poorly understood. In this study, soils were collected from abandoned sites of a REEs mine, and the structure, diversity, and co-occurrence patterns of soil microbiota were evaluated by Illumina high-throughput sequencing targeting 16S rRNA genes. Although microbiota developed significantly along with the natural restoration, the microbial structure on the site abandoned for 10 years still significantly differed from that on the unmined site. Potential plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPB) were identified by comparing 16S sequences against a self-constructed PGPB database via BLAST, and it was found that siderophore-producing and phosphorus-solubilizing bacteria were more abundant in the studied soils than in reference soils. Canonical correspondence analysis indicated that species richness of plant community was the prime factor affecting microbial structure, followed by limiting nutrients (total carbon and total nitrogen) and REEs content. Further co-occurring network analysis revealed nonrandom assembly patterns of microbiota in the studied soils. These results increase our understanding of microbial variation and assembly pattern during natural restoration in REE contaminated soils.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据