4.7 Article

Highly efficient oxygen evolution and stable water splitting by coupling NiFe LDH with metal phosphides

期刊

SCIENCE CHINA-MATERIALS
卷 64, 期 7, 页码 1662-1670

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s40843-020-1566-6

关键词

bifunctional electrocatalysis; oxygen evolution reaction; phosphides; layered double hydroxides; water splitting

资金

  1. Hunan Provincial Science and Technology Plan Project [2017TP1001, 2020JJ4710]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFB0704100]
  3. State Key Laboratory Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The NiFe LDH@CoP/NiP3 electrocatalyst showed satisfactory OER activity and good stability for water splitting. With a current density of 82 mA cm(-2) at 300 mV overpotential, it outperformed CoP/NiP3 and NiFe LDH by 9.1 and 2.3 times, respectively.
It is a great challenge to develop highly active oxygen evolution reaction (OER) electrocatalysts with superior durability. In this study, a NiFe layered double hydroxide-decorated phosphide (NiFe LDH@CoP/NiP3) was constructed to display satisfactory OER activity and good stability for water splitting in alkaline media. At an overpotential of 300 mV, NiFe LDH@CoP/NiP3 achieved a current density of 82 mA cm(-2) for the OER, which was 9.1 and 2.3 times that of CoP/NiP3 and NiFe LDH, respectively. Moreover, the reconstruction behavior, during which oxyhydroxides formed, was studied by a combination of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, and scanning electron microscopy. A synergistic effect between NiFe LDH and CoP/NiP3 was also observed for the hydrogen evolution reaction. Furthermore, when NiFe LDH@CoP/NiP3 acted as both the cathode and anode for overall water splitting, a high current density of 100 mA cm(-2) was maintained for more than 275 h. In addition, under Xe light irradiation, a solar to hydrogen efficiency of 9.89% was achieved for solar-driven water splitting. This work presents the coupling of different active compositions, and can provide a reference for designing bi-functional electrocatalysts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据