4.7 Article Data Paper

Seventy years of data from the world's longest grazed and irrigated pasture trials

期刊

SCIENTIFIC DATA
卷 8, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41597-021-00841-x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Winchmore Irrigation Research Station
  2. Ministry for Agriculture and Fisheries
  3. AgResearch Ltd
  4. Fertiliser Association of New Zealand
  5. Our Land and Water National Science Challenge (from the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment) [C10X1507]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Winchmore trials in New Zealand have collected a vast amount of pasture and soil data over more than 70 years, which have been used in 475 publications spanning a wide range of research topics. These data are invaluable for predicting long-term soil accumulation and environmental issues, as well as guiding agricultural practices and policy-making.
Pastures are the most widespread land use, globally. The Winchmore trials were established in 1948-1949 in Canterbury, New Zealand and examined either different rates of phosphorus (P) fertiliser on the same irrigation schedule (Fertiliser trial), or different irrigation scheduling at the same rate of P application (Irrigation trial). About 96,000 records of soil chemistry and physical data and pasture yield and botanical composition are available along with nearly 7000 soil samples. These data have been used in 475 publications that have explored topics as diverse as: improvements in sheep, dairy and deer production; the efficacy and scheduling of irrigation; improvements in pasture and crop production; agronomic and environmental soil and water research; and entomology. In addition to above topics, these data are invaluable for calibrating models to predict long-term issues like the accumulation of soil carbon or contaminants like cadmium and informing policy on climate change and agricultural practices. The data and soil samples are available for use and may yet yield discoveries, unforeseen 70 years ago.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据