4.7 Article

Two infill criteria driven surrogate-assisted multi-objective evolutionary algorithms for computationally expensive problems with medium dimensions

期刊

SWARM AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION
卷 60, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.swevo.2020.100774

关键词

Computationally expensive problem; Multi-objective evolutionary algorithm; Infill criterion; Surrogate model

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of China [51825502]
  2. 111 Project [B16019]
  3. Program for HUST Academic Frontier Youth Team [2017QYTD04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a surrogate-assisted dominance-based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm, which can efficiently solve multi-objective computationally expensive problems with medium dimensions. By using convergence and diversity criteria collaboratively, the algorithm enhances the exploration of the population and improves the accuracy of surrogate models.
This paper proposed a surrogate-assisted dominance-based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm to solve multi-objective computationally expensive problems with medium dimensions. Two infill criteria are collaboratively used to select promising individuals for exact evaluations. The convergence-based criterion is used to promote the exploitation of current promising areas. This criterion also considers the dispersion of selected solutions to exploit current non-dominant front. The diversity-based criterion is used to enhance the exploration of the population and enhance the accuracy of surrogate models. The feedback information from the convergence-based criterion is used to adjust the frequency of using the diversity-based criterion in order to reduce the consumed function evaluations. Benchmark functions with dimensions varying from 8 to 30 and a reactive power optimization problem are used to test the proposed algorithm. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed algorithm significantly outperforms some state-of-the-art evolutionary algorithms on most problems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据