4.7 Article

Lipid peroxidation derived reactive carbonyl species in free and conjugated forms as an index of lipid peroxidation: limits and perspectives

期刊

REDOX BIOLOGY
卷 42, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.redox.2021.101899

关键词

Lipid peroxidation; Reactive carbonyl species; Covalent adducts; Protein carbonylation; Analytical methods; Biomarkers

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of Health, Rome, Italy [2019 ID 2755301 MPP 1A]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The interest in protein carbonylation has grown because protein adducts are recognized as being involved in the damaging action of oxidative stress. With the latest analytical methods, a deeper understanding of the molecular mechanisms of oxidative stress can be gained.
Reactive carbonyl species (RCS) formed by lipidperoxidation as free forms or as enzymatic and non-enzymatic conjugates are widely used as an index of oxidative stress. Besides general measurements based on derivatizing reactions, more selective and sensitive MS based analyses have been proposed in the last decade. Untargeted and targeted methods for the measurement of free RCS and adducts have been described and their applications to in vitro and ex vivo samples have permitted the identification of many biological targets, reaction mechanisms and adducted moieties with a particular relevance to RCS protein adducts. The growing interest in protein carbonylation can be explained by considering that protein adducts are now recognized as being involved in the damaging action of oxidative stress so that their measurement is performed not only to obtain an index of lipid peroxidation but also to gain a deeper insight into the molecular mechanisms of oxidative stress. The aim of the review is to discuss the most novel analytical approaches and their application for profiling reactive carbonyl species and their enzymatic and non-enzymatic metabolites as an index of lipid-oxidation and oxidative stress. Limits and perspectives will be discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据