4.7 Article

Observation of transition between multimode Q-switching and spatiotemporal mode locking

期刊

PHOTONICS RESEARCH
卷 9, 期 4, 页码 530-534

出版社

CHINESE LASER PRESS
DOI: 10.1364/PRJ.416523

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51527901, 61975090]
  2. National Key Scientific Instrument and Equipment Development Projects of China [2014YQ510403]
  3. State Key Laboratory of IPOC (BUPT), China [IPOC2020ZT02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The experimental observation of multimode Q-switching and spatiotemporal mode locking in a multimode fiber laser was reported. It was found that weak spatial filtering is essential for stable Q-switched pulses, while stronger spatial filtering is needed for spatiotemporal mode locking. Additionally, a reversible transition process between multimode Q-switching and spatiotemporal mode locking was achieved with specific spatial coupling and waveplates sets. The results contribute to understanding nonlinear dynamics in multimode fiber-based platforms and the development of high-pulse energy lasers.
We report experimental observation of multimode Q-switching and spatiotemporal mode locking in a multimode fiber laser. A typical steady Q-switching state is achieved with a 1.88 mu s pulse duration, a 70.14 kHz repetition rate, and a 215.8 mW output power, corresponding to the single pulse energy of 3.08 mu J. We find weak spatial filtering is essential to obtain stable Q-switched pulses, in contrast to the relatively stronger spatial filtering for spatiotemporal mode locking. Furthermore, a reversible transition process, as well as a critical bistable state, between multimode Q-switching and spatiotemporal mode locking, is achieved with specific spatial coupling and waveplates sets. We believe the results will not only contribute to understanding the complicated nonlinear dynamics in multimode, fiber-based platforms, but also benefit the development of promising high-pulse energy lasers. (C) 2021 Chinese Laser Press.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据