4.7 Article

Applying integrated assessment methodologies to air quality plans: Two European cases

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY
卷 65, 期 -, 页码 29-38

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.04.010

关键词

Urban air quality planning; Local integrated assessment; Emission reduction scenarios; Surrogate model; Cost-benefit

资金

  1. European Union's Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration [CA 308395]
  2. FEDER through the COMPETE Programme
  3. national funds from FCT - Science and Technology Portuguese Foundation [SFRH/BD/101660/2014]
  4. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/101660/2014] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Air pollution Integrated Assessment Models (IAM) can be used for determining how emissions should be reduced to improve air quality and to protect human health in a cost-efficient way. The application of IAM is also useful to spread information to the general public and to explain the effectiveness of proposed Air Quality Plans. In this paper, the application of the RIAT+ system to determine suitable abatement measures to improve the air quality at a regional/local level is presented for two European cases: the Brussels Capital Region (Belgium) and the Porto Urban Area (Portugal). Both regions are affected with PM10 or NO2 concentrations that exceed the limit values specified by the European Union legislation. To properly assess air quality abatement measures a surrogate model was used, allowing the implementation of an efficient optimization procedure. This model is derived in both cases through a set of simulations performed using a Chemistry Transport Model fed with different emission reduction scenarios. In addition, internal costs (due to the implementation of emission reduction measures) and external costs (due to population exposure to air pollutant concentrations) of policy options were considered. The application of this integrated assessment modelling system in scenario (Brussels case) and optimization (Porto) modes contributes to identifying some advantages and limitations of these two approaches and also provides some guidance when urban air quality has to be assessed. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据