4.2 Article

The new X-ray absorption fine-structure beamline with sub-second time resolution at the Taiwan Photon Source

期刊

JOURNAL OF SYNCHROTRON RADIATION
卷 28, 期 -, 页码 930-938

出版社

INT UNION CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
DOI: 10.1107/S1600577521001740

关键词

XAFS; QXAFS; in situ/operando

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology (MoST) of Taiwan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The new TPS 44A beamline at the Taiwan Photon Source is equipped with a new quick-scanning monochromator for XAFS spectroscopy experiments. It demonstrated the capability to collect spectra at the limits of the working energy range, tested the performance of the beamline, and showed the ability to collect XAFS spectra on a sub-second timescale.
The new TPS 44A beamline at the Taiwan Photon Source, located at the National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center, is presented. This beamline is equipped with a new quick-scanning monochromator (Q-Mono), which can provide both conventional step-by-step scans (s-scans) and on-the-fly scans (q-scans) for X-ray absorption fine-structure (XAFS) spectroscopy experiments, including X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) and extended X-ray absorption fine-structure (EXAFS) spectral measurements. Ti and Te K-edge XAFS spectra were used to demonstrate the capability of collecting spectra at the limits of the working energy range. The Ni and Cu K-edge XAFS spectra for a Cu-doped Pt/Ni nanocomposite were acquired to test the performance of the newly commissioned beamline. Pt L-3- and Ru K-edge quick-scanning XAFS (QXAFS) spectra for standard Pt and Ru foils, respectively, revealed the stability of the q-scan technique. The results also demonstrated the beamline's ability to collect XAFS spectra on a sub-second timescale. Furthermore, a Zn-(s)vertical bar Zn-(aq)(2+)vertical bar Cu-(s) system was tested to indicate that the states of the Zn electrode could be observed in real time for charging and discharging conditions using an in situl op erando setup combined with QXAFS measurements.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据