4.8 Review

Revisiting the Role of Natural Killer Cells in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

期刊

FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.640869

关键词

NK cells; NAFLD; NASH; metabolism; obesity

资金

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia y Innovacion, Gobierno Espana [SAF2017-87301-R, RTI2018-096759-A-100]
  2. Asociacion Espanola contra el Cancer
  3. 2018 BBVA Foundation Grants for Scientific Research Teams
  4. Instituto de Salud Carlos III
  5. BBSRC Institute Strategic Programme Gut Microbes and Health [BBS/E/F/00044509]
  6. BBSRC [BB/CCG1860/1]
  7. BBSRC Institute Strategic Programme Food Innovation and Health [BB/R012512/1, BBS/E/F/000PR10347, BB/R012490/1, BBS/E/F/000PR10355]
  8. BBSRC [BBS/E/F/00044509, BBS/E/F/000PR10355] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

NAFLD is the most common form of chronic liver disease, with NASH representing an advanced stage. NK cells play a key role in supporting hepatic inflammation in NASH, with research showing differential functions in different environments. Therapeutic approaches based on the modulation of NK cells show potential in managing NASH progression.
Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) is the most common form of chronic liver disease. The histological spectrum of NAFLD ranges from simple steatosis to chronic inflammation and liver fibrosis during Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH). The current view is that innate immune mechanisms represent a key element in supporting hepatic inflammation in NASH. Natural Killer (NK) cells are lymphoid cells and a component of the innate immune system known to be involved in NASH progression. Increasing evidence has shed light on the differential function of circulating and tissue-resident NK cells, as well as on the relevance of metabolism and the microenvironment in regulating their activity. Here, we revisit the complex role of NK cells as regulators of NASH progression as well as potential therapeutic approaches based on their modulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据