4.7 Article

The nitrogen legacy: emerging evidence of nitrogen accumulation in anthropogenic landscapes

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/11/3/035014

关键词

nitrogen; nutrients; time lags; water quality; retention; soil

资金

  1. National Science Foundation Coupled Natural and Human Systems program [1114978]
  2. University of Iowa
  3. University of Waterloo
  4. NSERC
  5. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie
  6. Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci [1114978] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Watershed and global-scale nitrogen (N) budgets indicate that the majority of the N surplus in anthropogenic landscapes does not reach the coastal oceans. While there is general consensus that this 'missing' Neither exits the landscape via denitrification or is retained within watersheds as nitrate or organic N, the relative magnitudes of these pools and fluxes are subject to considerable uncertainty. Our study, for the first time, provides direct, large-scale evidence of N accumulation in the root zones of agricultural soils that may account for much of the 'missing N' identified in mass balance studies. We analyzed long-term soil data (1957-2010) from 2069 sites throughout the Mississippi River Basin (MRB) to reveal N accumulation in cropland of 25-70 kg ha(-1) yr(-1), a total of 3.8 +/- 1.8 Mt yr(-1) at the watershed scale. We then developed a simple modeling framework to capture N depletion and accumulation dynamics under intensive agriculture. Using the model, we show that the observed accumulation of soil organic N(SON) in the MRB over a 30 year period (142 Tg N) would lead to a biogeochemical lag time of 35 years for 99% of legacy SON, even with complete cessation of fertilizer application. By demonstrating that agricultural soils can act as a net N sink, the present work makes a critical contribution towards the closing of watershed N budgets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据