4.6 Article

Synthesis, Photophysical, and Computational Studies of a Bridged IrΙΙΙ-PtΙΙ Heterodimetallic Complex

期刊

CRYSTALS
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cryst11030236

关键词

bridging ligands; transition metal complexes; dual emissions; iridium; platinum

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22004041, 21925112, 21975264, 21872154, 22090021]
  2. Promotion Program for Young and Middle-aged Teacher in Science and Technology Research of Huaqiao University [ZQN-PY519]
  3. Quanzhou City Science & Technology Program of China [2019C064R]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study focused on the structures and luminescence properties of three different metal complexes, with the heterodimetallic complex exhibiting excitation wavelength-dependent dual singlet and triplet emissions. Theoretical calculations were conducted to assist in interpreting the experimental findings.
An Ir-III-Pt-II heterodimetallic complex [(ppy)(2)Ir(dapz)PtCl2]Cl (4), together with the corresponding monometallic complexes [(dapz)PtCl2] (2) and [(ppy)(2)Ir(dapz)]Cl (3) was designed and prepared, where dapz is 2,5-di(N-methyl-N '-(pyrid-2-yl)amino)pyrazine and ppy is 2-phenylpyridine, respectively. Single-crystal X-ray analysis was carried out for complex 4, displaying the intermolecular Pt center dot center dot center dot Pt and aromatic plane center dot center dot center dot plane distances of 3.839 and 3.886 angstrom, respectively. The monometallic complex 2 exhibits a single emission maximum at 432 nm with a shorter excited-state lifetime (tau) of 6 ns, while complex 3 exhibits an emission band at 454 nm with a longer excited-state lifetime of 135 ns in CH3CN (N-2-saturated) under ambient conditions. In contrast, the heterodimetallic complex 4 displays intriguing excitation wavelength-dependent dual singlet and triplet emissions. Theoretical calculations of the electronic structures and absorption spectra of these complexes were carried out to assist the interpretation of these experimental findings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据