4.6 Article

Nonclassical Nucleation-Role of Metastable Intermediate Phase in Crystal Nucleation: An Editorial Prefix

期刊

CRYSTALS
卷 11, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cryst11020174

关键词

nonclassical nucleation theory; metastable intermediates

资金

  1. deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Classical nucleation theory is the most commonly used theory in describing nucleation processes, but recent studies have revealed nonclassical features in the early stage of nucleation. The fluid-to-solid transition leads to the so-called two-step nucleation mechanism, involving the existence of a metastable intermediate phase alongside the initial supersaturated solution and the final crystals.
Classical nucleation theory (CNT), which was established about 90 years ago, represents the most commonly used theory in describing nucleation processes. For a fluid-to-solid phase transition, CNT states that the solutes in a supersaturated solution reversibly form small clusters. Once a cluster reaches its critical size, it becomes thermodynamically stable and is favored for further growth. One of the most important assumptions of CNT is that the nucleation process is described by one reaction coordinate and all order parameters proceed simultaneously. Recent studies in experiments, computer simulations, and theory have revealed nonclassical features in the early stage of nucleation. In particular, the decoupling of order parameters involved during a fluid-to-solid transition leads to the so-called two-step nucleation mechanism, in which a metastable intermediate phase (MIP) exists in parallel to the initial supersaturated solution and the final crystals. These MIPs can be high-density liquid phases, mesoscopic clusters, or preordered states. In this Special Issue, we focus on the role of the various MIPs in the early stage of crystal nucleation of organic materials, metals and alloys, aqueous solutions, minerals, colloids, and proteins, and thus on various scenarios of nonclassical pathways of crystallization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据