4.6 Article

Component-Oriented Modeling of a Micro-Scale Organic Rankine Cycle System for Waste Heat Recovery Applications

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 11, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app11051984

关键词

micro-scale ORC; off-design performance; experimental modeling; volumetric pump modeling; low-grade waste heat recovery applications

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study focuses on evaluating the performance of an organic Rankine cycle system in off-design conditions, emphasizing the significance and impact of the pump, with a maximum net electric power of about 200 W.
Featured Application The waste heat from industrial processes or energy conversion systems may vary appreciably with time. The proposed numerical model aims at assessing the per-formance of a small-scale organic Rankine cycle system in off-design operating conditions, which may occur in the case of low-grade waste heat recovery. Organic Rankine cycle (ORC) systems are some of the most suitable technologies to produce electricity from low-temperature waste heat. In this study, a non-regenerative, micro-scale ORC system was tested in off-design conditions using R134a as the working fluid. The experimental data were then used to tune the semi-empirical models of the main components of the system. Eventually, the models were used in a component-oriented system solver to map the system electric performance at varying operating conditions. The analysis highlighted the non-negligible impact of the plunger pump on the system performance Indeed, the experimental results showed that the low pump efficiency in the investigated operating range can lead to negative net electric power in some working conditions. For most data points, the expander and the pump isentropic efficiencies are found in the approximate ranges of 35% to 55% and 17% to 34%, respectively. Furthermore, the maximum net electric power was about 200 W with a net electric efficiency of about 1.2%, thus also stressing the importance of a proper selection of the pump for waste heat recovery applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据