4.6 Review

Wind-Induced Phenomena in Long-Span Cable-Supported Bridges: A Comparative Review of Wind Tunnel Tests and Computational Fluid Dynamics Modelling

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 11, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app11041642

关键词

long-span bridge; cable-supported bridge; aerodynamics; wind tunnel test; computational fluid dynamics; flutter; vortex-induced vibration; rain-wind-induced vibration

资金

  1. China Scholarship Council [201808300003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Engineers, architects, planners, and designers need to carefully consider the effects of wind on long-span bridges, with traditional wind tunnel tests and computational fluid dynamics simulations being common methods for analysis. This paper focuses on research regarding wind issues on long-span cable-supported bridges, including flutter, vortex-induced vibrations, and rain-wind-induced vibrations. The paper provides a state-of-the-art review on the use of wind tunnel tests and computational fluid dynamics modelling for analyzing wind effects on long-span bridges.
Engineers, architects, planners and designers must carefully consider the effects of wind in their work. Due to their slender and flexible nature, long-span bridges can often experience vibrations due to the wind, and so the careful analysis of wind effects is paramount. Traditionally, wind tunnel tests have been the preferred method of conducting bridge wind analysis. In recent times, owing to improved computational power, computational fluid dynamics simulations are coming to the fore as viable means of analysing wind effects on bridges. The focus of this paper is on long-span cable-supported bridges. Wind issues in long-span cable-supported bridges can include flutter, vortex-induced vibrations and rain-wind-induced vibrations. This paper presents a state-of-the-art review of research on the use of wind tunnel tests and computational fluid dynamics modelling of these wind issues on long-span bridges.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据