4.6 Review

Review of Liquid Argon Detector Technologies in the Neutrino Sector

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 11, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app11062455

关键词

time projection chambers; noble liquid detectors; cryogenic detectors; neutrino detectors; micropattern gaseous detectors; photon detectors for UV; visible and IR photons (solid-state); large detector systems for particle and astroparticle physics

资金

  1. European Research Council [677927]
  2. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/S000879/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. European Research Council (ERC) [677927] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Liquid Argon (LAr) is widely used in particle detection due to its low cost, high availability, and excellent scintillation properties. Many neutrino experiments are based on using LAr in Time Projection Chambers (TPCs) for high resolution three-dimensional particle reconstruction. Current experiments include both single phase and dual phase LAr experiments, with new research focusing on LArTPC readout technologies for potential wide-scale use in the future.
Liquid Argon (LAr) is one of the most widely used scintillators in particle detection, due to its low cost, high availability and excellent scintillation properties. A large number of experiments in the neutrino sector are based around using LAr in one or more Time Projection Chambers (TPCs), leading to high resolution three-dimensional particle reconstruction. In this paper, we review and summarise a number of these Liquid Argon Time Projection Chamber (LArTPC) experiments, and briefly describe the specific technologies that they currently employ. This includes single phase LAr experiments (ICARUS T600, MicroBooNE, SBND, LArIAT, DUNE-SP, ProtoDUNE-SP, ArgonCube and Vertical Drift) and dual phase LAr experiments (DUNE-DP, WA105, ProtoDUNE-DP and ARIADNE). We also discuss some new avenues of research in the field of LArTPC readout, which show potential for wide-scale use in the near future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据