4.6 Review

Design for Additive Manufacturing: Tool Review and a Case Study

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 11, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app11041571

关键词

additive manufacturing; industrial design; fused deposition modeling; parametric design; industrial design; CAD computer aided design; topology optimization; lattice design

资金

  1. Junta de Andalucia (INNANOMAT research group) [TEP946]
  2. department of mechanical engineering and industrial design at the Engineering School from Cadiz University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper gathers various computer-aided engineering (CAE) tools specifically developed for additive manufacturing (AM) to enhance product development capabilities. The flexibility of AM process enables the production of highly complex shapes previously impossible, allowing for the use of existing design tools like topology optimization and novel developments like lattice design tools in applications previously limited by conventional industrial processes.
This paper aims to collect in a structured manner different computer-aided engineering (CAE) tools especially developed for additive manufacturing (AM) that maximize the capabilities of this technology regarding product development. The flexibility of the AM process allows the manufacture of highly complex shapes that are not possible to produce by any other existing technology. This fact enables the use of some existing design tools like topology optimization that has already existed for decades and is used in limited cases, together with other novel developments like lattice design tools. These two technologies or design approaches demand a highly flexible manufacturing system to be applied and could not be used before, due to the conventional industrial process limitations. In this paper, these technologies will be described and combined together with other generic or specific design tools, introducing the study case of an additive manufactured mechanical design of a bicycle stem.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据