4.6 Review

Clinical Applications of In Vivo and Ex Vivo Confocal Microscopy

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 11, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app11051979

关键词

skin cancer; in vivo confocal microscopy; ex vivo confocal microscopy; melanoma; basal cell carcinoma

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) is a valuable tool in clinical settings, providing a quasi-histologic view of tissues without the need for biopsy. It has shown to improve diagnostic accuracy of skin cancers and contribute to reducing unnecessary excisions, as well as improving margin recognition for tissue sparing in excisions. Further studies using CLSM in real-life settings could enhance our understanding of its applications.
Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) has been introduced in clinical settings as a tool enabling a quasi-histologic view of a given tissue, without performing a biopsy. It has been applied to many fields of medicine mainly to the skin and to the analysis of skin cancers for both in vivo and ex vivo CLSM. In vivo CLSM involves reflectance mode, which is based on refractive index of cell structures serving as endogenous chromophores, reaching a depth of exploration of 200 mu m. It has been proven to increase the diagnostic accuracy of skin cancers, both melanoma and non-melanoma. While histopathologic examination is the gold standard for diagnosis, in vivo CLSM alone and in addition to dermoscopy, contributes to the reduction of the number of excised lesions to exclude a melanoma, and to improve margin recognition in lentigo maligna, enabling tissue sparing for excisions. Ex vivo CLSM can be performed in reflectance and fluorescent mode. Fluorescence confocal microscopy is applied for real-time pathological examination of freshly excised specimens for diagnostic purposes and for the evaluation of margin clearance after excision in Mohs surgery. Further prospective interventional studies using CLSM might contribute to increase the knowledge about its application, reproducing real-life settings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据