4.6 Article

Antidiabetic, Anticholesterol, and Antioxidant Activity of Gryllus bimaculatus Fermented by Bacillus and Lactobacillus Strains

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 11, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app11052090

关键词

edible insect; fermentation; antioxidant activity; antidiabetic activity; anticholesterol activity

资金

  1. National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea [2020R1I1A3 072127]
  2. Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture, and Forestry (IPET) [119019-02-1-HD020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The functionality of Gryllus bimaculatus fermented by different Bacillus and Lactobacillus strains was investigated, showing that fermentation enhanced the bioactivity of Gryllus bimaculatus. Among the strains tested, Lactobacillus plantarum MKHA15 exhibited the highest SOD-like activity and antioxidant ability.
In this study, functionality of Gryllus bimaculatus (GB) fermented by Bacillus and Lactobacillus strain was investigated. GB was fermented by each of the following strains: probiotic Bacillus amyloliquefaciens MKSK-J1 (SKGB), probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum MKHA15 (HAGB), Bacillus amyloliquefaciens MKSE (SEGB), and Lactobacillus plantarum KCTC 3103 (LPGB). Fermentation was carried out at 35 degrees C for 24 h. In HAGB, complete inhibition of alpha-glucosidase and 3-hydroxy-methyl glutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase occurred (101.94% and 120.89%, respectively), and superoxide dismutase (SOD)-like activity (IC50) was significantly low (22.37 mg/mL). After in vitro digestion, SOD-like activity was the highest in HAGB (21.18%). In SKGB, reducing power (EC50) was significantly low (0.29 mg/mL). After in vitro digestion, the reducing was also highest in SKGB (86.06%). Fermentation enhanced the bioactivity of GB; in particular, MKHA15 was found to have great potential as a starter in the production of fermented GB, as it would offer multi-health functions, including antidiabetic, anticholesterol, and antioxidant activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据