4.7 Article

Aberration corrected STEM techniques to investigate polarization in ferroelectric domain walls and vortices

期刊

APL MATERIALS
卷 9, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/5.0035958

关键词

-

资金

  1. US-Ireland R&D Partnership Programme [USI 120]
  2. Science Foundation Ireland [16/US/3344]
  3. SFI Industry Fellowship [18/IF/6282]
  4. Royal Society University Research Fellowship [URF\R1\201318]
  5. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [16/US/3344] Funding Source: Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Advancements in electron microscopy have allowed for the exploration of the complex nature of ferroelectric topological defects, observing changes in polarization, chemical composition, charge density, and strain. Current achievements include mapping the 3D nature of ferroelectric polar skyrmions and in situ biasing. The research focuses on understanding the fundamental physics and dynamics of domain wall and polar vortex formation in ferroelectrics.
Ferroelectric domain wall (DW) based nano-electronics is an emerging new field of research. It is only recently with advancements in electron and atomic force microscopy instrumentation that the complex nature of these 2D entities can be probed. In this Research Update, the advances in aberration corrected scanning transmission electron microscopy applied to ferroelectric topological defects are summarized. We discuss sub-atomic imaging and diffraction techniques used to observe changes in polarization, chemical composition, charge density, and strain at DWs and vortices. We further highlight the current achievements in mapping the 3D nature of ferroelectric polar skyrmions and in situ biasing. This Review will focus on both the fundamental physics of DW and polar vortex formation and their dynamics. Finally, we discuss how electron spectroscopy can be used to relate the quantified structural distortions of polar topological entities to changes in their oxidation state and band structure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据