4.5 Article

Lack of Simple Correlation between Switching Current Density and Spin-Orbit-Torque Efficiency of Perpendicularly Magnetized Spin-Current-Generator-Ferromagnet Heterostructures

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW APPLIED
卷 15, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.15.024059

关键词

-

资金

  1. Office of Naval Research [N000141512449]
  2. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency [USDI D18AC00009]
  3. NSF MRSEC program through the Cornell Center for Materials Research [DMR-1719875]
  4. NSF [ECCS-1542081]
  5. U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) [N000141512449] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Defense (DOD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research shows that there is no simple correlation between the efficiency of dampinglike spin orbit torque and the critical switching current density of perpendicularly magnetized spin-current generator-ferromagnet heterostructures, especially in micrometer-sized samples. The values of efficiency based on switching current densities can sometimes severely underestimate or overestimate the actual efficiency, making critical switching current densities alone a poor predictor of the relative strength of spin-current generators.
Spin-orbit torque can drive electrical switching of magnetic layers. Here, we report that, at least for micrometer-sized samples, there is no simple correlation between the efficiency of dampinglike spin orbit torque (xi(j)(DL)) and the critical switching current density of perpendicularly magnetized spin-current generator-ferromagnet heterostructures. We find that the values of xi(j)(DL) based on switching current densities can either under-or overestimate xi(j)(DL) by up to 10 times in a domain-wall depinning analysis, while, in the macrospin analysis based on the switching current density, xi(j)(DL) can be overestimated by up to 1000 times. When comparing the relative strengths of xi(j)(DL) of spin-current generators, the critical switching current densities by themselves are a poor predictor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据