4.0 Article

Impact of Delayed Time to Treatment on Visual Outcomes in Neovascular AMD: Data From the HARBOR Study

期刊

出版社

SLACK INC
DOI: 10.3928/23258160-20210201-02

关键词

-

资金

  1. Genentech, Inc., a member of the Roche Group

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the HARBOR study, more than 50% of patients received their first injection within 7 days of screening. The time to treatment for the prompt and delayed treatment groups were 4.6 (5) days and 15.9 (14) days, respectively. There was no significant difference in BCVA change and number of ranibizumab injections between the prompt and delayed treatment groups.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To determine the potential impact on visual outcomes of delayed treatment initiation in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Post hoc analysis of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment-naive patients with nAMD from HARBOR. Time to treatment was defined as first ranibizumab injection date minus screening date. Comparisons were made between the prompt (<= 6 days) versus delayed (> 10 days) treatment groups. Main outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change over time, BCVA, number of ranibizumab injections, and proportion of 3-line gainers/losers. RESULTS: In HARBOR, more than 50% of patients received their first injection within 7 days of screening, with mean (median) time to treatment of 4.6 (5) and 15.9 (14) days for the prompt and delayed treatment groups, respectively. Mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) BCVA change from baseline to Month 24 was 9.1 (7.4-10.8) and 8.8 (6.7-10.8) Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters in the prompt (n = 395) and delayed (n = 230) treatment groups, respectively. Mean (95% CI) total number of ranibizumab injections for the as-needed arms was 12.4 (11.6-13.3) and 11.4 (10.3-12.4) for the prompt and delayed treatment groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: In HARBOR, time from screening to first ranibizumab injection did not seem to significantly affect mean BCVA change or number of injections.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据