4.2 Article

Uncontrolled asthma: a retrospective cohort study in Japanese patients newly prescribed with medium-/high-dose ICS/LABA

期刊

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41533-021-00222-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. Novartis Pharma K.K.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite guideline-based therapies, a significant proportion of asthma patients in Japan prescribed with inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting beta(2)-agonist (ICS/LABA) remain uncontrolled, with predictors such as systemic corticosteroid use, exacerbation history, comorbidities, and female gender. Healthcare resource utilization was higher in patients with uncontrolled asthma in both medium-dose and high-dose ICS/LABA cohorts, indicating a need for novel therapies in these patients with persistent asthma.
Many asthma patients remain uncontrolled despite guideline-based therapies. We examined real-life asthma control in Japanese patients prescribed with inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting beta(2)-agonist (ICS/LABA). Patients (>= 12 years) with >= 2 asthma diagnoses, newly initiated on medium-/high-dose ICS/LABA (Japanese asthma guidelines), from 01 April 2009 to 31 March 2015 were included, using Japan Medical Data Center Claims Database. Primary objective: proportion of patients with uncontrolled asthma in the year following ICS/LABA initiation. Secondary objectives: predictors of uncontrolled asthma and healthcare resource utilization. In medium-dose (N = 24,937) and high-dose (N = 8661) ICS/LABA cohorts, 23% and 21% patients, respectively, were uncontrolled. Treatment step up and exacerbation were most common indicators of uncontrolled asthma. Predictors of uncontrolled asthma, analyzed by multivariable Cox model, included systemic corticosteroid use, exacerbation history, comorbidities, and being female. In both cohorts, healthcare resource utilization was higher in patients with uncontrolled asthma. Over 20% patients with persistent asthma who initiated medium- or high-dose ICS/LABA were uncontrolled, highlighting unmet need for novel therapies in these patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据