4.5 Article

Combining Differential Scanning Calorimetry and Cooling-Heating Curve Thermal Analysis to Study the Melting and Solidification Behavior of Al-Ce Binary Alloys

期刊

METALS
卷 11, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/met11020372

关键词

aluminum-cerium alloys; solidification; differential scanning calorimetry; cooling curve thermal analysis

资金

  1. Program of Energy Research and Development (PERD) of Natural Resources Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study utilized DSC and CCTA thermal analysis techniques to evaluate the solidification and melting behavior of Al-Ce binary alloys, revealing significant differences in reaction temperatures under different alloy compositions that may exceed the typical measurement errors for each technique. Additionally, differences were observed in detecting certain reactions and non-equilibrium effects between DSC and CCTA.
Two common techniques of thermal analysis, Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) and Cooling/Heating Curve Thermal Analysis (CCTA), based on different signal collected and utilizing samples with a weight difference of three orders of magnitude, were used to assess the solidification and melting behavior of Al-Ce binary alloys, containing from 5 to 20 wt. % Ce. Thermal analysis was accompanied by microscopic observations of solidified structures. For heating/cooling rates of 0.2-0.4 degrees C/s, temperatures of eutectic transformation L <-> Al + Al11Ce3 in the Al-10Ce alloy along with additional proeutectic reactions L <-> Al in the Al-5Ce hypoeutectic alloy and L <-> Al11Ce3 in Al-15Ce and Al-20Ce hypereutectic alloys, were determined. Although there was a general agreement in major transformations, registered by DSC and CCTA during melting and solidification, differences in the reaction temperature determined exceeded the typical measurement errors for each technique. In addition, DSC and CCTA exhibited differences in detecting some proeutectic reactions and minor non-equilibrium effects, accompanying the eutectic transformation. Some factors that could contribute to differences observed and their implications for engineering practice were discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据