4.4 Article

Functional Assessment of BRCA1 variants using CRISPR-Mediated Base Editors

期刊

出版社

JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS
DOI: 10.3791/61557

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [2017M3A9B4062419, 2019R1F1A1057637, 2018R1A5A2020732]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2019R1F1A1057637, 2017M3A9B4062419] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a new method for functional analysis of BRCA1 variants using CRISPR-mediated cytosine base editor, overcoming issues related to overexpression and post-transcriptional regulation. The researchers identified ambiguous BRCA1 variants and demonstrated the effectiveness of CRISPR-mediated base editors in reclassifying variants of uncertain significance.
Recent studies have investigated the risks associated with BRCA1 gene mutations using various functional assessment methods such as fluorescent reporter assays, embryonic stem cell viability assays, and therapeutic drug-based sensitivity assays. Although they have clarified a lot of BRCA1 variants, these assays involving the use of exogenously expressed BRCA1 variants are associated with overexpression issues and cannot be applied to post-transcriptional regulation. To resolve these limitations, we previously reported a method for functional analysis of BRCA1 variants via CRISPR-mediated cytosine base editor that induce targeted nucleotide substitution in living cells. Using this method, we identified variants whose functions remain ambiguous, including c.-97C>T, c.154C>T, c.3847C>T, c.5056C>T, and c.4986+5G>A, and confirmed that CRISPR-mediated base editors are useful tools for reclassifying the variants of uncertain significance in BRCA1. Here, we describe a protocol for functional analysis of BRCA1 variants using CRISPR-based cytosine base editor. This protocol provides guidelines for the selection of target sites, functional analysis and evaluation of BRCA1 variants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据