4.7 Article

Scenario assessment for producing methanol through carbon capture and utilization technologies considering regional characteristics

期刊

JOURNAL OF CO2 UTILIZATION
卷 45, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcou.2021.101452

关键词

CO2 utilization; Carbon capture; Carbon footprint; Methanol; Social implementation scenarios

资金

  1. Council for Science, Technology and Innovation (CSTI), Cross-ministerial Strategic Innovation Promotion Program (SIP), Energy systems toward a decarbonized society (Funding agency: JST)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study evaluated the potential of carbon capture and utilization technology in reducing CO2 emissions and proposed guidelines for optimizing social implementation scenarios.
Carbon capture and utilization (CCU) technology can be used to reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and mitigate climate change. CCU technology efficiencies and regional characteristics were evaluated by integrating process simulation and carbon footprint estimation to determine the optimal social implementation scenarios from the CO2 emissions reduction perspective. Methanol (MeOH) was chosen as the CCU product, and the energy efficiency of MeOH synthesis under various conditions was assessed. For social implementation scenarios, location of each technology, capacity of renewable energy and H-2 manufacturing method, process configuration, CO2 source, and separation/recovery technology were used as conditions for the evaluation. Based on 11 cases with varying conditions, the partial oxidation and dry reforming of CH4 was determined to exhibit the greatest CO2 emission reduction potential. However, when considering renewable energy expansion, direct MeOH synthesis exhibited a greater CO2 reduction potential. Based on the results, CCU optimal social implementation scenarios evaluation guidelines were determined. These guidelines can be implemented at a large scale to determine the viability and effectiveness of CCU technologies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据