Perceptions of Agent Loyalty with Ancillary Users

Intelligent agents are part of the smartphones, smart speakers, and home robots that millions of us own and interact with regularly. However, little is known about if or how these agents should be embodied. Additionally, as conversations with agents move from heavily structured and transactional to more flexible and, at times, social, embodiment may play a more nuanced and variable role. This paper describes an experimental study that examined the effects of embodiment and quality of information on people's perceptions of an intelligent agent. We conducted a 3x2 between-subjects experiment in which participants completed an escape room-like task with the help of an artificial personal assistant that had a robotic embodiment, a virtual embodiment, or no embodiment. Participants were given either helpful or unhelpful information about the task. Findings suggest that people can attribute the quality of loyalty to an agent that belongs to someone else and may work on their behalf, and that in the context of a complex problem-solving situation that involves time pressure, people may prefer an embodied robot or a disembodied voice over a virtually embodied agent.

Automated summary

The study suggests that in situations involving complex problem-solving, people may prefer embodied robots or disembodied voices over virtually embodied agents. Additionally, people may attribute the quality of loyalty to an agent that works on behalf of someone else.