4.6 Article

Decomposition of Additive-Free Formic Acid Using a Pd/C Catalyst in Flow: Experimental and CFD Modelling Studies

期刊

CATALYSTS
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/catal11030341

关键词

formic acid decomposition; H-2 production; computational fluid dynamics (CFD); microreactors; Pd catalyst; green chemistry

资金

  1. London South Bank University, School of Engineering

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that under mild conditions of 30 degrees Celsius, the decomposition of formic acid for hydrogen production using a Pd/C catalyst and fixed bed microreactor can be achieved effectively. It was also observed that after multiple reactivation processes, the catalyst could maintain its activity.
The use of hydrogen as a renewable fuel has gained increasing attention in recent years due to its abundance and efficiency. The decomposition of formic acid for hydrogen production under mild conditions of 30 degrees C has been investigated using a 5 wt.% Pd/C catalyst and a fixed bed microreactor. Furthermore, a comprehensive heterogeneous computational fluid dynamic (CFD) model has been developed to validate the experimental data. The results showed a very good agreement between the CFD studies and experimental work. Catalyst reusability studies have shown that after 10 reactivation processes, the activity of the catalyst can be restored to offer the same level of activity as the fresh sample of the catalyst. The CFD model was able to simulate the catalyst deactivation based on the production of the poisoning species CO, and a sound validation was obtained with the experimental data. Further studies demonstrated that the conversion of formic acid enhances with increasing temperature and decreasing liquid flow rate. Moreover, the CFD model established that the reaction system was devoid of any internal and external mass transfer limitations. The model developed can be used to successfully predict the decomposition of formic acid in microreactors for potential fuel cell applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据