4.6 Article

Redundancy-Free Models for Mathematical Descriptions of Three-Phase Catalytic Hydrogenation of Cinnamaldehyde

期刊

CATALYSTS
卷 11, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/catal11020207

关键词

hydrogenation of cinnamaldehyde; interval analysis; Langmuir-Hinshelwood mechanism; kinetic modeling; redundancy-free model; sensitivity analysis

资金

  1. Maria-Reiche Programme at TU Dresden

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new approach for formulating redundancy-free models for three-phase catalytic hydrogenation of cinnamaldehyde is presented in this study, with models based on formal kinetics and the Langmuir-Hinshelwood theory being investigated. The redundancy-free models were obtained by eliminating model parameters step by step using sensitivity and interval analysis. The model based on the Langmuir-Hinshelwood mechanism has fewer parameters compared to the model based on formal kinetics.
A new approach on how to formulate redundancy-free models for mathematical descriptions of three-phase catalytic hydrogenation of cinnamaldehyde is presented. An automatically created redundant (generalized) model is formulated according to the complete reaction network. Models based on formal kinetics and kinetics concerning the Langmuir-Hinshelwood theory for three-phase catalytic hydrogenation of cinnamaldehyde were investigated. Redundancy-free models were obtained as a result of a step-by-step elimination of model parameters using sensitivity and interval analysis. Starting with 24 parameters in the redundant model, the redundancy-free model based on the Langmuir-Hinshelwood mechanism contains 6 parameters, while the model based on formal kinetics includes only 4 parameters. Due to less degrees of freedom of molecular rotation in the adsorbed state, the probability of a direct conversion of cinnamaldehyde to 3-phenylpropanol according to the redundancy-free model based on Langmuir-Hinshelwood approach is practically negligible compared to the model based on formal kinetics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据