4.6 Article

Ecosystem Services Assessment Tools for Regenerative Urban Design in Oceania

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 13, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su13052825

关键词

ecosystem-based adaptation; multidisciplinary design; urban ecology; Pacific islands; nature-based design; SIDS; climate change adaptation; New Zealand; urban design

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tools that spatially model ecosystem services have the potential to integrate ecology into regenerative urban design, but few are designed specifically for assessing ecosystem services in cities. A review of 95 tools found only four deemed relevant for urban design projects, which allow spatially explicit visualization of biophysical quantification of ecosystem services. The reliability of outputs from these tools varies and is often influenced by the technical expertise of the user.
Tools that spatially model ecosystem services offer opportunities to integrate ecology into regenerative urban design. However, few of these tools are designed for assessing ecosystem services in cities, meaning their application by designers is potentially limited. This research reviews and compares a range of ecosystem services assessment tools to find those that are most suited for the urban context of Oceania. The tool classification includes considerations of type of input and output data, time commitment, and necessary skills required. The strengths and limitations of the most relevant tools are further discussed alongside illustrative case studies, some collected from literature and one conducted as part of this research in Wellington, Aotearoa using the Land Utilisation and Capability Indicator (LUCI) tool. A major finding of the research is that from the 95 tools reviewed, only four are judged to be potentially relevant for urban design projects. These are modelling tools that allow spatially explicit visualisation of biophysical quantification of ecosystem services. The ecosystem services assessed vary among tools and the outputs' reliability is often highly influenced by the user's technical expertise. The provided recommendations support urban designers and architects to choose the tool that best suits their regenerative design project requirements.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据