4.6 Article

Evaluation of the Melting Performance in a Conical Latent Heat Thermal Unit Having Variable Length Fins

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 13, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su13052667

关键词

latent heat thermal energy storage (LHTES); conical shape; non-uniform fin; nano-enhanced phase change material (NePCM)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A conical shell-tube design with non-uniform fins was used for phase change latent heat thermal energy storage (LHTES), filled with nano-enhanced phase change material. The study focused on optimizing design parameters, such as shell aspect ratio and fins aspect ratio, to maximize the melting rate. The results showed that the type and concentration of nanoparticles also played important roles in improving the performance of LHTES units.
A conical shell-tube design with non-uniform fins was addressed for phase change latent heat thermal energy storage (LHTES). The shell was filled with nano-enhanced phase change material (NePCM). The cone aspect ratio of the shell and the fins aspect ratio were adopted as the geometrical design parameters. The type and volume fraction of the nanoparticles were other design parameters. The investigated nanoparticles were alumina, graphite oxide, silver, and copper. The finite element method was employed to solve the natural convection flow and phase change thermal energy equations in the LHTES unit. The Taguchi optimization method was utilized to maximize the melting rate in the unit. Two cases of ascending and descending conical shells were investigated. The outcomes showed that the shell-aspect ratio and fin aspect ratio were the most important design parameters, followed by the type and concentration of nanoparticles. Both ascending and descending designs could lead to the same melting rate at their optimum design. The optimum design of LHTES could improve the melting rate by up to 18.5%. The optimum design for ascending (descending) design was a plain tube (a cone aspect ratio of 1.17) filled by 4.5% alumina-Bio-PCM (1.5% copper-Bio-PCM).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据