4.6 Article

Science-Based Targets: On Target?

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 13, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su13041657

关键词

climate; climate change mitigation; science-based targets; corporate social responsibility; emissions reduction; mitigation target; greenhouse gas accounting; corporate; reporting; sustainability

资金

  1. UK Research and Innovation through the Centre for Research into Energy Demand Solutions [EP/R035288/1]
  2. EPSRC [EP/R035288/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Companies are increasingly aligning their actions with the goals of the Paris Agreement, with over 1000 supporting the science-based targets initiative. Academic literature has shown limited attention to this initiative, and a quantitative assessment of 81 companies revealed varying progress towards their set targets, especially in Scope 3 emissions.
Companies are increasingly seeking to align their actions with the goals of the Paris Agreement. Over 1000 such companies have committed to the science-based targets initiative which seeks to align corporate carbon reduction targets with global decarbonisation trajectories. These 'science-based targets' are developed using a common set of resources and target-setting methodologies, then independently assessed and approved by a technical advisory group. Despite the initiative's rapid rise to public prominence, it has received little attention to date in the academic literature. This paper discusses development of the initiative based upon a quantitative assessment of progress against each component of the science-based targets set by 81 early adopters, using information gathered from company annual reports, corporate social responsibility websites and Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) responses. The analysis reveals a mixed picture of progress. Though the majority of targets assessed were on track and, in some cases, had already been achieved, just under half of the companies assessed were falling behind on one or more of their targets. Progress varied significantly by target scope, with more limited progress against targets focused on Scope 3 emissions. Company reporting practices were highly variable and often of poor quality. This paper concludes with a range of recommendations to improve the transparency, consistency and comparability of targets within this key agenda-setting initiative.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据