4.6 Review

City Region Food Systems: Building Resilience to COVID-19 and Other Shocks

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 13, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su13031325

关键词

resilience; sustainable food system; COVID-19; climate change; policy; infrastructure

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture [GCP-FAO-2018-1]
  2. CGIAR Research ProgrammeWater Land and Ecosystems
  3. Social Sciences Humanities Research Council of Canada [895-2015-1016]
  4. Wilfrid Laurier University/Laurier Centre for Sustainable Food Systems

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper uses examples from the COVID-19 pandemic to review the importance of the City Region Food Systems approach for regional sustainability and resilience against shocks, emphasizing key aspects such as multistakeholder engagement, infrastructure support, and policy roles.
Using examples from the COVID-19 pandemic, this paper reviews the contribution a City Region Food Systems (CRFS) approach makes to regional sustainability and resilience for existing and future shocks including climate change. We include both explicit interventions under United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO-RUAF) led initiatives, as well as ad hoc efforts that engage with elements of the CRFS approach. To provide context, we begin with a literature review of the CRFS approach followed by an overview of the global food crisis, where we outline many of the challenges inherent to the industrial capital driven food system. Next, we elaborate three key entry points for the CRFS approach-multistakeholder engagement across urban rural spaces; the infrastructure needed to support more robust CRFS; system centered planning, and, the role of policy in enabling (or thwarting) food system sustainability. The pandemic raises questions and provides insights about how to foster more resilient food systems, and provides lessons for the future for the City Region Food System approach in the context of others shocks including climate change.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据