4.6 Article

Defining, Conceptualizing, and Measuring Organizational Resilience: A Multiple Case Study

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 13, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su13052517

关键词

organizational resilience; dimensions; multiple case study; scale development

资金

  1. National Social Science Fund of China [16AGL004]
  2. 2019 Youth Project of Fujian Province Social Science Planning [FJ2019C031]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study revealed that organizational resilience consists of five dimensions, and the measurement scale has good reliability and validity, better reflecting the concept of organizational resilience.
Organizational resilience is an important means of coping with crises. This concept has received much attention within both academia and industry. However, research on the definition and measurement of organizational resilience is still in the exploratory stage. To date, studies on organizational resilience have yielded mixed conclusions, which makes it difficult to provide specific recommendations for coping with crises. This paper uses an exploratory case study approach to explore the process of organizational resilience among six highly resilient companies: Southwest Airlines, Apple, Microsoft, Starbucks, Kyocera, and Lego. We employed grounded theory to distill the main characteristics of organizational resilience, to explore and validate its structural dimensions, and to develop a measurement scale for organizational resilience. Further, we conducted reliability and validity analysis, exploratory factor analysis, and validation factor analysis on the 526 valid data collected. Results show that organizational resilience includes five dimensions: capital resilience, strategic resilience, cultural resilience, relationship resilience, and learning resilience. The measurement scale has good reliability and validity, which better reflects the notion of organizational resilience. This study bridges the gaps in the existing literature on organizational resilience and its measurement scales, and provides a foundation for future research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据