4.6 Article

Comfort within Budget: Assessing the Cost-Effectiveness of Envelope Improvements in Single-Family Affordable Housing

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 13, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su13063054

关键词

sustainable and affordable architecture; affordable housing; social housing; optimised building envelope; thermal comfort; thermal performance; costs; cost-effectiveness; case study

资金

  1. Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES)
  2. University of Nottingham

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluates the thermal performance of two affordable houses and proposes methods for improving envelope performance while considering cost-effectiveness. The findings show significant improvement in indoor thermal comfort through passive design strategies.
In Brazil, the delivery of homes for low-inc ome households is dictated by costs rather than performance. Issues such as the impact of climate change, affordability of operational energy use, and lack of energy security are not taken into account, even though they can severely impact the occupants. In this work, the authors evaluated the thermal performance of two affordable houses as-built and after the integration of envelope improvements. A new replicable method to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of these improvements was proposed. The case study houses comprise the most common affordable housing type delivered widely across Brazil and a proposition of a better affordable housing solution, built in Porto Alegre, southern Brazil, integrating passive design strategies to increase thermal comfort. The findings reveal a potential for improving indoor thermal conditions by up to 76% and 73%, respectively, if costs are not a concern, and 40% and 45% with a cost increase of 12% and 9% if a comfort criterion of 20-25 degrees C was considered. Equations to estimate costs of improvements in affordable housing were developed. The authors concluded that there is a great scope for building envelope optimisation, and that this is still possible without significant impact on budget.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据