4.5 Article

Recovery of Consciousness and Functional Outcome in Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

期刊

JAMA NEUROLOGY
卷 78, 期 5, 页码 548-557

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.0084

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIDILRR within the Administration for Community Living, US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) [90DRTB0002, 90DPTB0007, 90DPTB0011, 90DPTB0004]
  2. Veterans Health Administration Central Office VA TBI Model Systems Program of Research
  3. NIDILRR [90DPTB0007, 1004324] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that most patients with TBI initially experienced DOC, and it persisted in some patients after rehabilitation, but the majority of those with persisting DOC recovered consciousness during rehabilitation.
IMPORTANCE Traumatic brain injury (TBI) leads to 2.9 million visits to US emergency departments annually and frequently involves a disorder of consciousness (DOC). Early treatment, including withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies and rehabilitation, is often predicated on the assumed worse outcome of disrupted consciousness. OBJECTIVE To quantify the loss of consciousness, factors associated with recovery, and return to functional independence in a 31-year sample of patients with moderate or severe brain trauma. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cohort study analyzed patients with TBI who were enrolled in the Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems National Database, a prospective, multiyear, longitudinal database. Patients were survivors of moderate or severe TBI who were discharged from acute hospitalization and admitted to inpatient rehabilitation from January 4, 1989, to June 19, 2019, at 1 of 23 inpatient rehabilitation centers that participated in the Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems program. Follow-up for the study was through completion of inpatient rehabilitation. EXPOSURES Traumatic brain injury. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Outcome measures were Glasgow Coma Scale in the emergency department, Disability Rating Scale, posttraumatic amnesia, and Functional Independence Measure. Patient-related data included demographic characteristics, injury cause, and brain computed tomography findings. RESULTS The 17 470 patients with TBI analyzed in this study had a median (interquartile range [IQR]) age at injury of 39 (25-56) years and included 12 854 male individuals (74%). Of these patients, 7547 (57%) experienced initial loss of consciousness, which persisted to rehabilitation in 2058 patients (12%). Those with persisting DOC were younger; had more high-velocity injuries; had intracranial mass effect, intraventricular hemorrhage, and subcortical contusion; and had longer acute care than patients without DOC. Eighty-two percent (n = 1674) of comatose patients recovered consciousness during inpatient rehabilitation. In a multivariable analysis, the factors associated with consciousness recovery were absence of intraventricular hemorrhage (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.678; 95% CI, 0.532-0.863; P=.002) and intracranial mass effect (adjusted OR, 0.759; 95% CI, 0.595-0.968; P=.03). Functional improvement (change in total functional independence score from admission to discharge) was +43 for patients with DOC and +37 for those without DOC (P=.002), and 803 of 2013 patients with DOC (40%) became partially or fully independent. Younger age, male sex, and absence of intraventricular hemorrhage, intracranial mass effect, and subcortical contusion were associated with better functional outcome. Findings were consistent across the 3 decades of the database. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This study found that DOC occurred initially in most patients with TBI and persisted in some patients after rehabilitation, but most patients with persisting DOC recovered consciousness during rehabilitation. This recovery trajectorymay inform acute and rehabilitation treatment decisions and suggests caution is warranted in consideration of withdrawing or withholding care in patients with TBI and DOC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据