4.7 Article

Sensitivity of the early-life stages of freshwater mollusks to neonicotinoid and butenolide insecticides

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
卷 218, 期 -, 页码 428-435

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.07.022

关键词

Mollusk; Freshwater mussel; Snail; Neonicotinoid; Butenolide

资金

  1. Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change (OMOECC)
  2. Ecotoxicology and Wildlife Health Division of Environment and Climate Change Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neonicotinoid insecticides can be transported from agricultural fields, where they are used as foliar sprays or seed treatments, to surface waters by surface or sub-surface runoff. Few studies have investigated the toxicity of neonicotinoid or the related butenolide insecticides to freshwater mollusk species. The current study examined the effect of neonicotinoid and butenolide exposures to the early-life stages of the ramshorn snail, Planorbella pilsbryi, and the wavy-rayed lampmussel, Lampsilis fasciola. Juvenile P. pilsbryi were exposed to imidacloprid, clothianidin, or thiamethoxam for 7 or 28 d and mortality, growth, and biomass production were measured. The viability of larval (glochidia) L. fasciola was monitored during a 48 h exposure to six neonicotinoids (imidacloprid, thiamethoxam, clothianidin, acetamiprid, thiacloprid, or dinotefuran), or a butenolide (flupyradifurone). The 7-d LC50s of P. pilsbryi for imidacloprid, clothianidin, and thiamethoxam were >= 4000 mu g/l. and the 28-d LC50s were >= 182 mu g/L. Growth and biomass production were considerably more sensitive endpoints than mortality with EC50s ranging from 33.2 to 122.0 mu g/L. The 48-h LC50s for the viability of glochidia were >= 456 mu g/L for all seven insecticides tested. Our data indicate that neonicotinoid and butenolide insecticides pose less of a hazard with respect to mortality of the two species of mollusk compared to the potential hazard to other non target aquatic insects. Crown Copyright (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据