4.7 Article

A century long sedimentary record of anthropogenic lead (Pb), Pb isotopes and other trace metals in Singapore

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
卷 213, 期 -, 页码 446-459

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.02.040

关键词

Pb; Pb isotopes; Heavy metals; Southeast Asia; Singapore; Sediment

资金

  1. Singapore National Research Foundation (NRF) through the Singapore-MIT Alliance for Research and Technology (SMART) Center for Environmental Sensing and Modelling (CENSAM)
  2. Singapore Ministry of Education under the Research Centres of Excellence initiative [M4430139]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reconstructing the history of metal deposition in Singapore lake sediments contributes to understanding the anthropogenic and natural metal deposition in the data-sparse Southeast Asia. To this end, we present a sedimentary record of Pb, Pb isotopes and eleven other metals (Ag, As, Ba, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Ni, Tl, U and Zn) from a well-dated sediment core collected near the depocenter of MacRitchie Reservoir in central Singapore. Before the 1900s, the sedimentary Pb concentration was less than 2 mg/kg for both soil and sediment, with a corresponding Pb-206/Pb-207 of similar to 1.20. The Pb concentration increased to 55 mg kg in the 1990s, and correspondingly the Pb-206/Pb-207 decreased to less than 1.14. The Pb-206/Pb-207 in the core top sediment is concordant with the Pb-206/Pb-207 signal of aerosols in Singapore and other Southeast Asian cities, suggesting that Pb in the reservoir sediment was mainly from atmospheric deposition. Using the Pb concentration in the topmost layer of sediment, the estimated atmospheric Pb flux in Singapore today is similar to 1.6 x 10(-2) g/m(2) yr. The concentrations of eleven other metals preserved in the sediment were also determined. A principal component analysis showed that most of the metals exhibit an increasing trend towards 1990s with a local concentration peak in the mid-20th century. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据