4.4 Article

The N=4 higher spin algebra for generic μ parameter

期刊

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
卷 -, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP02(2021)123

关键词

AdS-CFT Correspondence; Conformal and W Symmetry; Higher Spin Gravity; Higher Spin Symmetry

资金

  1. Korean Local Governments-Gyeongsangbuk-do Province
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF) - Korea government(MSIT) [2020R1F1A1066893]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [4120200113725, 2020R1F1A1066893] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the complete N = 4 higher spin algebra for general mu was determined by explicitly calculating the (anti)commutators between the N = 4 higher spin generators for low spins. It was found that the structure constants involve a linear combination of two different generalized hypergeometric functions, which remain invariant under the transformation mu <-> (1 - mu). Additionally, it was confirmed that the N = 4 higher spin algebra contains the N = 2 higher spin algebra as a subalgebra.
The N = 4 higher spin generators for general superspin s in terms of oscillators in the matrix generalization of AdS(3) Vasiliev higher spin theory at nonzero mu (which is equivalent to the 't Hooft-like coupling constant lambda) were found previously. In this paper, by computing the (anti)commutators between these N = 4 higher spin generators for low spins s(1) and s(2) (s(1) + s(2) <= 11) explicitly, we determine the complete N = 4 higher spin algebra for generic mu. The three kinds of structure constants contain the linear combination of two different generalized hypergeometric functions. These structure constants remain the same under the transformation mu <-> (1 - mu) up to signs. We have checked that the above N = 4 higher spin algebra contains the N = 2 higher spin algebra, as a subalgebra, found by Fradkin and Linetsky some time ago.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据