4.4 Article

5D BPS quivers and KK towers

期刊

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
卷 -, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP02(2021)119

关键词

Field Theories in Higher Dimensions; Supersymmetric Gauge Theory; M-Theory; Solitons Monopoles and Instantons

资金

  1. KIAS Individual Grants at Korea Institute for Advanced Study [PG076901, PG071301, PG071302, PG005704]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [PG076901, PG071301, PG005704, PG071302] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focuses on BPS quivers for D = 5 theories, compactified on a circle and engineered over local Calabi-Yau 3-folds. It discusses the challenges faced in known machineries and proposes mathematical theorems to address the difficulties. The study finds that for Abelian quivers, the counting can be reduced to a geometric one, while for non-Abelian quivers, the cohomology approach fails.
We explore BPS quivers for D = 5 theories, compactified on a circle and geometrically engineered over local Calabi-Yau 3-folds, for which many of known machineries leading to (refined) indices fail due to the fine-tuning of the superpotential. For Abelian quivers, the counting reduces to a geometric one, but the technically challenging L-2 cohomology proved to be essential for sensible BPS spectra. We offer a mathematical theorem to remedy the difficulty, but for non-Abelian quivers, the cohomology approach itself fails because the relevant wavefunctions are inherently gauge-theoretical. For the Cartan part of gauge multiplets, which suffers no wall-crossing, we resort to the D0 picture and reconstruct entire KK towers. We also perform numerical checks using a multi-center Coulombic routine, with a simple hypothesis on the quiver invariants, and extend this to electric BPS states in the weak coupling chamber. We close with a comment on known Donaldson-Thomas invariants and on how L-2 index might be read off from these.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据