4.6 Article

Finding Influential Nodes in Multiplex Networks Using a Memetic Algorithm

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CYBERNETICS
卷 51, 期 2, 页码 900-912

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCYB.2019.2917059

关键词

Influence maximization; multiplex networks; optimization

资金

  1. General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China [61773300]
  2. Key Program of Fundamental Research Project of Natural Science of Shaanxi Province, China [2017JZ017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper addresses the issue of finding influential nodes in realistic multiplex networks by designing an extended influence spreading model and developing a memetic algorithm. Experimental results validate the effectiveness of the algorithm, offering solutions for identifying potential propagators in multiplex social networks.
In order to find the nodes with better propagation ability, a large body of studies on the influence maximization problem has been conducted. Several influence spreading models and corresponding optimization algorithms have been proposed and successfully identified the infusive seeds in single isolated networks. However, as indicated by some recent studies and online materials, modern networked systems tend to have more complicated structures and multiple layers, which makes it difficult for existing seed determination techniques to deal with these networks. Thus, finding influential nodes in realistic multiplex networks remains open. Therefore, this paper aims to design an extended influence spreading model to simulate the influence diffusion process in multiplex networks, based on which a memetic algorithm is developed to find the seeds that are influential in all network layers. Experimental results on synthetic and real-world networks validate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm. These results are helpful for identifying potential propagators in multiplex social networks, and provide solutions to analyze and gain deeper insights into networked systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据