4.6 Article

Linguistic Distribution and Priority-Based Approximation to Linguistic Preference Relations With Flexible Linguistic Expressions in Decision Making

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CYBERNETICS
卷 51, 期 2, 页码 649-659

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCYB.2019.2953307

关键词

Consistency; flexible linguistic expression (FLE); linguistic decision-making; linguistic preference relation (LPR); preference loss

资金

  1. NSF of China [71871149, 71701158]
  2. Sichuan University [sksyl201705, 2018hhs-58]
  3. Ministry of Education Project of Humanities and Social Sciences, China [17YJC630114]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article introduces the concept of flexible linguistic preference relations (FLPRs) and proposes a method to rank alternatives based on FLPRs by exploring linguistic distribution (LD) and priority-based approximation (PA). By approximating FLPRs to distribution linguistic preference relations (DLPRs) and deriving priority vectors with desired properties, the proposed method is illustrated through a comparative analysis of priority vectors derived from different types of linguistic preference relations.
In this article, we propose the concept of flexible linguistic preference relations (FLPRs), in which the flexible linguistic expressions, a more flexible way to form linguistic expressions, are employed. Further, we present a method to rank alternatives based on preference information in FLPRs by exploring the linguistic distribution (LD) and priority-based approximation (PA) of FLPRs. In the LD-based approximation, we first present a two-stage optimization process to approximate FLPRs to distribution linguistic preference relations (DLPRs) following the principles of minimum preference loss and maximum consistency. Then in the PA process, we derive priority vectors from the DLPRs with some desired properties. Finally, a comparative analysis of the priority vectors derived from different kinds of linguistic preference relations is presented to illustrate our proposal.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据